Influencer Relations is Hard Work… And Worth It

Posted by: in Social Media Insights & Trends on February 25, 2011

Jim Edwards weighed in today on how Novartis has been paying bloggers to post nice things about their new iPhone app.  Edwards was less than favorable of both the app and the campaign, saying of the app, “It’s a good thing this app is free, because it’s terrible,” and regarding the campaign, “Standards for brands may be high, but standards for blog posts are low”.  Edwards has a point – Novartis is just one of many companies to be publicly flogged for their use of “sponsored posts” through companies like IZEA or MomTrends.

What many companies (and their agencies) are discovering is that influencer relations in social media is difficult – and very different from traditional PR.  Online influencers like bloggers, forum posters, and Twitterers need to be approached in different ways, with a different tone, length, and purpose to your outreach.  You can’t “pitch” online influencers, for example.  You can only alert them to relevant news/updates and hope they find it interesting enough to share with their audience.  If you’ve done your job right, then you should have selected influencers who are naturally interested in the topic, and alerted them to relevant news.  As long as you’ve done so, voila! you’ll find they start talking about your brand.

Not only does paying for sponsored posts lead to a tisk-tisking from the blogosphere, as Edwards also points out, often times the posts are of very low quality and uncompelling.  Many bloggers are happy to write about a product in exchange for money, even when they’ve never used the product.  Their endorsement in these cases falls flat and fails to convince their readers.

I’m not saying that companies should not be ponying up cash if they want to reach people in social media.  Integration between influencer relations and the media/advertising house is essential to building relationships and reaching people over time.  However, as with those dinosaur publications like the NY Times, there needs to be a line between editorial and advertising.  The line may be shifting and the engagement changing in nature, but simply paying someone for an insincere endorsement is never going to be the answer.

By: Paul Dyer

Leader, Media + Engagement

Find me on: Twitter Facebook
Pre-Commerce Check out W2O Group President Bob Pearson's new book, Pre-Commerce, in which he shares ideas for leaders to engage directly with customers to shape their brand and marketplace success. Now available for order on Amazon.com! http://amzn.to/bAmvFN. Join the conversation #precommerce.

3 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. Zoe Healey said

    Agree. Corporate responsibility is about trust and credibility these days and comms is at the heart of this. There is a sea change in comms and marketing ethics, perhaps down to greater consumer digital access and interaction driving respect for individuals.

  2. Paul Dyer said

    Great point, Zoe. Unfortunately, corporate responsibility isn’t ingrained through the ranks in very many companies. Those who are trying to fill out a weekly coverage report don’t necessarily think or care about the impact they’re having on the company’s reputation when they start crossing these ethical boundaries.

  3. I’ll go on step further: part of the reason that pitching is hard work and difficult (unless you grease palms) is that no “influencer” — be they at the New York Times or Seeryusmama.com — wants to interact solely by press release. Yes: if you spam your release wide enough to mommybloggers or whatever the online tribe you identify, you can get hits, but it comes at a cost of credibility.

    The hard work is building a relationship *first*, before you need to pitch. If you don’t care enough to do that, why should anyone listen to you when you do have something to flack?

    The problem is that relationship-building doesn’t scale. But that certainly doesn’t make it a waste of time.

Some HTML is OK

(required)

(required, but never shared)

or, reply to this post via trackback.